by Vivek Gupta - 5 days ago - 5 min read
Oracle is preparing one of the largest capitals raises ever attempted by a technology company, and the reason is simple: artificial intelligence demand is arriving faster than its balance sheet can handle.
On February 1, 2026, Oracle disclosed plans to raise between $45 billion and $50 billion this year through a mix of debt and equity. The money is earmarked almost entirely for expanding Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, which has become a critical supplier of computing power for some of the most aggressive AI builders in the world, including OpenAI, Meta, Nvidia, AMD, TikTok, and Elon Musk’s xAI.
The announcement formalizes what credit markets have been signaling for months: Oracle’s AI ambitions are colliding with financial reality.
Oracle’s move is not speculative. It is contractual.
In September 2025, the company quietly entered into a cloud computing agreement with OpenAI valued at roughly $300 billion over five years, beginning in 2027. That deal alone implies about $60 billion a year in computing demand and an estimated requirement of millions of GPUs and several gigawatts of data center capacity.
Since then, Oracle has reported a surge in signed cloud commitments. In its December earnings update, the company said remaining performance obligations had reached $523 billion, more than five times higher than a year earlier. On paper, it is one of the largest contracted backlogs ever disclosed by a U.S. company.
The problem is timing. Oracle has to build the infrastructure now, while much of the revenue arrives years later.
Roughly half of the funding is expected to come from a single bond issuance early in 2026, likely in the $22.5 to $25 billion range. The rest will come from equity, using a combination of mandatory convertible securities and a newly authorized at-the-market program that allows Oracle to sell shares gradually, depending on market conditions.
That structure is designed to limit shock. A single equity offering of that size would be difficult for the market to absorb, especially after Oracle’s stock lost more than half its value since peaking in September 2025.
Even spread out, the dilution could reach 4 to 5 percent, a meaningful cost for shareholders already nursing losses.
The urgency behind the raise is visible in Oracle’s credit indicators.
Insurance on Oracle’s debt, measured through credit default swaps, surged to levels not seen since the financial crisis. At its December peak, the five-year CDS spread implied a default probability above 9 percent, far higher than peers such as Microsoft, Google, or Amazon.
This reaction came despite Oracle beating earnings expectations and reporting strong cloud growth. Investors focused instead on capital expenditure guidance, which jumped to $50 billion for fiscal 2026, and on free cash flow that turned sharply negative as spending accelerated.
In one quarter alone, Oracle spent about $12 billion on capital investments while generating just over $2 billion in operating cash flow.
The financing strain has spilled into courtrooms and loan desks.
In January 2026, a group of bondholders filed suit alleging Oracle failed to adequately disclose how much additional debt it would need when it issued $18 billion in bonds last fall. Weeks later, reports surfaced that several U.S. banks had stepped back from financing Oracle-related data center projects, forcing the company to look to more expensive or less flexible funding sources.
Some projects have reportedly stalled as lenders reassess risk, particularly around customer concentration.
At the center of the concern is Oracle’s reliance on OpenAI.
OpenAI generates an estimated $10 to $12 billion in annual revenue but has committed to spending multiples of that on cloud infrastructure. That gap can be bridged only if OpenAI continues to raise vast sums from investors.
For Oracle, the chain is unforgiving. It borrows to build data centers, OpenAI must pay Oracle, and Oracle then services its debt. If OpenAI’s funding slows or its economics deteriorate, Oracle could be left with specialized infrastructure and enormous liabilities.
Analysts estimate Oracle may need to invest more than $150 billion just to support OpenAI’s requirements, before accounting for other customers.

Wall Street is deeply divided.
Optimists argue Oracle is positioning itself as a hyperscale AI infrastructure provider just as demand explodes. If even a portion of its $523 billion backlog converts as expected, today’s spending could look prescient five years from now.
Skeptics see a different picture: a company taking on debt at a moment when financing costs are rising, cash flow is negative, and customer risk is unusually concentrated. Some banks have cut price targets sharply, warning that even a successful capital raise may only buy time, not resolve the structural mismatch between spending and receipts.
Oracle’s situation has broader implications.
It is one of the first major companies to test whether the AI infrastructure boom can be financed sustainably through debt. Unlike diversified cloud rivals, Oracle is more exposed to a handful of massive customers whose own business models remain unproven.
If Oracle struggles to fund signed demand, it raises uncomfortable questions for the rest of the AI ecosystem. Are contracts enough, or does the industry need a new financing model for infrastructure that must be built years ahead of revenue?
Oracle’s planned $50 billion raise is not just about shoring up a balance sheet. It is a referendum on the economics of large-scale AI.
Success would validate the idea that cloud providers can front-load investment and trust that long-term contracts will carry them through. Failure, or even partial success at punitive costs, would signal that the AI boom may be running faster than capital markets can comfortably support.
For now, Oracle is betting that demand is real, customers will pay, and investors will stay patient.
The next year will decide whether that confidence was strategic foresight or financial overreach.