A Former Platform for Tech Writers That No Longer Works as Intended
For years, Techsslaash.com positioned itself as a platform for developers, AI practitioners, and cybersecurity professionals to publish tutorials and earn from reader engagement. On paper, it looked promising—syntax-friendly editor, SEO features, and monthly payouts.
However, as of now, the website does not appear to be functional. Multiple Independent reviews, including Trustpilot feedback and employee insights on AmbitionBox, highlight concerns about its current functionality. Several user experiences suggest the site is no longer operational, aligning with detailed user reports on SchoolUnzip’s Techsslash review that point out persistent technical issues and unresponsive support.

Techsslaash.com positioned itself as a tech publishing and earning platform aimed at:
The site promoted:
On paper, it looked like a Medium-style platform focused on technical depth.
Here’s the reality based on current testing and user reports:
| Feature | Current Status |
|---|---|
| Homepage access | Loads |
| Article submission | Not working |
| Login system | Broken |
| Analytics dashboard | Inaccessible |
| Payout / rewards | No evidence of activity |
| Support or contact | Unresponsive |
| Editorial review | No visible activity |
In short, the site exists, but the platform does not function.
_1754910945.webp)
Clicking “Submit Article” does not open an editor
A static email ID briefly flashes, but no workflow follows
No confirmation, upload form, or editorial pipeline exists
Login attempts redirect to dead or looping pages
Valid credentials fail to authenticate
No password reset or recovery system works
For a publishing platform, this alone makes Techsslaash unusable.
_1752571649.png)

Over time, Techsslaash.com shifted from being a promising hub for tech professionals to a platform plagued by broken features and unfulfilled promises. Reviews on Trustpilot, AmbitionBox, and SchoolUnzip consistently highlight issues like inactive payouts, inaccessible dashboards, and an unresponsive support team. Without transparency or working submission options, many tech writers have labeled the platform as unreliable, leading to a significant loss of trust in the community.
From a security standpoint:
The site does not appear to host malware
However, it is abandoned or poorly maintained
Best practice:
Do not upload original content, personal data, or credentials to a platform that shows signs of neglect.
| Platform | Domain Authority (DA) | Niche | Guest Policy | Content Style | Why It’s Better |
| HackerNoon | 81+ | Tech, AI, Web3, startups, programming | Open to contributions via editorial platform | Personal experience, tool reviews, tutorials, opinion pieces | Offers real editorial control, exposure to a large tech community |
| ReadWrite | 82+ | AI tools, gadgets, cybersecurity, software | Accepts pitches via contact forms or editor email | Long-form, expert analysis, tool comparison articles | Reaches B2B buyers, tech enthusiasts, and those looking for in-depth insights |
| TechBullion | 58+ | Fintech, AI, blockchain, marketing tools | Accepts free and sponsored posts | Press releases, startup launches, AI product breakdowns | Flexible for startups, great for quick coverage and backlinks |
| DataDrivenInvestor | 90+ (Medium-hosted) | AI, big data, investing, digital business | Requires application to contribute | Insight articles, AI innovation stories, thought leadership | Perfect for AI founders and analysts looking to reach data investors |
| Publish0x | 65+ | Web3, crypto, emerging tech | Open submission model | Earn crypto tips for popular content | Offers rewards through crypto tips, adds value beyond SEO |
When choosing where to publish, assess each platform by these factors:
| Factor | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Domain Authority (DA) | Impacts SEO value of backlinks |
| Traffic Volume | More readers = more visibility |
| Editorial Quality | Better editing = stronger brand credibility |
| Audience Relevance | AI writers need AI readers, not just generic views |
| Content Ownership | Check if you retain rights to republish |
| Backlink Policy | Do they allow follow links or only nofollow? |
| Submission Fees | Some charge for sponsored posts; others are free |
Pro tip: If your content includes visual guides or tutorials, platforms like HackerNoon or ReadWrite will showcase them better. Writers creating 3D/AI or design-based tutorials might even cross-reference resources such as this Sketchfab guide for artists and developers to make their submissions more useful.
No. Techsslaash.com is not a viable platform in its current state.
Website loads, but platform is effectively inactive
Submission and login systems are broken
No evidence of payouts or editorial activity
Trust among tech writers has collapsed
None, at present.
Avoid submitting content. Choose platforms that are operational, transparent, and supportive of creators.
Q1: Can I still publish articles on Techsslaash.com?
A: No. The submission process does not work. Clicking “Submit Article” only flashes an email ID and doesn’t lead to any working editor or upload tool.
Q2: Is the article review or editorial team still active?
A: There is no visible way to submit articles for review, and no confirmation that editorial functions are currently operational.
Q3: Does the reward or payout system still work?
A: The site mentions engagement-based payouts, but no payout dashboard or earning method is accessible. There’s no evidence that rewards are being processed.
Q4: Are the links and resources on the site reliable?
A: Several links are broken, inactive, or redirect to irrelevant or empty pages. Use caution when exploring.
Q5: Is Techsslaash.com safe to use?
A: The site does not appear malicious, but its current state shows signs of neglect. Always avoid entering personal data or uploading content to non-functional platforms.
Q6: Who is behind Techsslaash.com?
A: No updated or verifiable information is available about the site’s ownership, team, or active maintenance.
Be the first to post comment!